How Issues Are Affected By the Political Spectrum

On April 30, 1789, the United States of America pick tabu our first pre human facent to lead our country. whence every four years in that locationafter, other pre slopent is elected. When election time comes about most Ameri shtups do not turn in anything about the issues involved and/or do not even know who is running. The dickens sure candidates this year atomic number 18 Al pierce, the Democrat, and George provide, the Republican. Three main issues that whatsoever(prenominal) parties turn over with atomic number 18 Social Security, levy Reform, and Education. Depending on from each one(prenominal) candidates authoritiesal platform, they can be placed nigh on the political spectrum. discerning where a candidate stands on the political spectrum, you can assume how he would experience on certain issues. Social Security is a huge issue this year because galore(postnominal) citizens atomic number 18 concerned that they are paying the complaisant warranter ta x, alone with the current fancy, the money leave alone run out by the time they get ageing enough to use it. Al bloodshed plans on victorious amicable warrantor and identifyting it aside and adding the interest gained to it which in his words, I exit keep it in a lockbox. The interest savings, I would put right back into it.That extends the life for 55 years (Issues2000. om). boards plan relates to the liberal side of the political spectrum. norm eithery most liberals believe in to a greater extent government involvement and less sizable corporations. He is look that the social security tax will go into a lockbox and no money will be establishn out of it leave it all to the government. Today liberals view government as protecting one-on-ones from be ill-treated by a variety of governmental and nongovernmental forces, such as market vagaries, origin decisions, and discriminatory practices (Burns 243). This leads into why George Bush is a cautious.He plans on takin g social security and putting it into the hands of our citizens and allowing them to pull their money in stocks. Bush wants to take the money out of the governments hands and put it in the individuals hands. Im qualifying to trust young workers at their option to be able to manage, under certain guidelines, roughly of their money to get a better rate of return so that theyll declare a retirement plan in the future (issues2000. com). Basically he is act allow the young workers to control their social security rather than the government.This issue orders how both different sides of the political spectrum can hit the way they attack a problem. Tax Reform is another issue where both candidates differ greatly. Al Gore believes there should be a tax drop for the lower category and middle class families, but not for the wealthy class. This is original for a normal liberal to say. They believe the government should help those who are in need and leave those who dont alone. Lib erals prefer that government take caution of the weak, for the strong can nearly continuously take care of themselves (Burns 244).With Gores plan, the classifiable familys taxes would be the terminal in fifty years. This is by all odds taking care of the weak part of society, the typical family. Bush, on the other hand, says he wants a tax trend for everyone. He believes everyone should deserve a tax relief, not further the middle class. This sounds good, but really the overlargegest cut would be in the f number class, who really do not need a tax cut. This just shows how Bush is being conservative by helping the declamatory businesses, which make up most of the upper class. Traditional conservatives, in the name of freedom, are emphatically pro-business (248).Each candidate tries to show why their tax reform plans are better, but it just comes down to how each candidate relates to the political spectrum. Another big issue this year is Education. Both candidates feel diffe rently about this issue. Al Gore believes that students who attend a flunk inculcate would be allowed to go to better take aim until that school is reopened under new management. He overly says that schools that are doing poorly in student achievement would be devoted a fund to help them meliorate. any progressing school would be given monetary awards to help them strive to become better.This is considered a liberal view because he is saying that any weak school will be helped out by the government. In addition, he is supporting the improvement of about schools that are not meeting the standards. George Bush agrees aboutwhat, but he believes that if a school is failing, they have three years to pertain the problems. If they dont, they will be shut down and are demanded to give nearly money towards sending the students to other schools. He also says he would require examen be done every year.The schools that improve would get a bonus turn the schools that are failing would lose some federal funds (English handout). Conservatives are also inclined to believe that those who fail in life are in some way the architects of their own misfortune and thence must bear the main state for solving their own problems (Burns 247). He is conservative by saying that the responsibility of failing schools is to fix the problems themselves. Some parts of this issue, education, Gore and Bush agree on but for the most part, they are like on two different sides of the political spectrum. Knowing where the candidate is located on the political spectrum, each issue can be related to how the candidate feels.Even though there are many issues a soon-to-be president has to discuss, there are definitely three main issues that affect everyone somehow. They all show a definite side of the political platform by each candidate. Each candidates side was relating to one side of the political spectrum such, as Democrats tend to be liberal, while Republicans are considered conser vative. Referring back to the first paragraph, maybe we should feigning after our ancestors back when majority of our citizens truly cared about who was running and how they felt on the issues.